Tech, Gadgets, Photography, Social Media and Poor Spelling
I recently did as part of a study some research into the question “Do mobile phones cause brain cancer?” and the findings were very scary in so much as most of the up to date research on the internet points to a 1996 study and the results from that.
Standards, frequencies and mobiles have changed in 16 years and this recent maskable story by Emily Price does seem to ask the right questions:
The FCC may be taking another look at its standards pertaining to radio frequency energy emitted from cellphones, particularly whether or not mobile phones cause brain tumors or other health concerns.
According to Reuters, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowskicirculated a proposal Friday to other FCC commissioners asking for a formal inquiry into the standards the agency set in 1996.
While a spokesman stressed that the FCC doesn’t specifically think mobile phones are at the root of any health issues, the inquiry would revisit the issue and ensure there wasn’t scientific evidence to the contrary. The proposal will need to be approved by the majority of the five commissioners before being released to the public for comment.
In May of last year, the World Health Organization classified cellphones as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” placing them on the same list as coffee and picked vegetables. At the time, IARC Director Christopher Wild said “It is important that additional research be conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones,” and warned against their use before said research was conducted.
A 1,000-participant study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute a few months later, however, indicated there was no link between cellphones and cancer.
The FCC set its standards for a safe level of radio frequency emissions from cellphones in 1996. Currently each phone that is sold in the United States is tested by the FCC against those standards, and must receive approval from the organization before being sold to consumers.
What do you think? Should the FCC take another look at the standards it set in 1996? Let us know what you think in the comments.
Personally i’m glad that this research is happening again, and believe it should be revisited every 5 years as tech changes this will become more important to keep both the hardware industry safe and honest.